IN SEARCH OF INTELLIGENCE unites families advancing next generation's life on earth. December 2024, Wash DC, chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk ; linkedin UNwomens::: 2025Reporter Club
Over 60% of people depend on pacific trades. Because of Western era of Empire, Pacific people's growth exponentials have depended on what von neumann called designing development rpind above zero-sum trading maps through 3 waves of "millions times more tech brainpower : Moore's engineers of linking in silicon chip valley 95-65; Satellite Data worlkdwiode 5G to 1G (2015-1990), Partners of Jensen Huang's Deep Data Computing & Learning ets Stanford Engineeriing Quadrangle 2010
That's our open syatem foundations observation. scaling over 75 years since John Von Neumann asked Economist journalists to mediate futures of brainworking through 3 million fold hi-tech waves :Moore's Silicon Valley,*Satellites 1G to 5G Death of Distance mobilising data round earth* Jensens platforms for DEEP LEARNING Data Science aligned to Einstein's 1905 nano-science-Earth revolution. NB Miraculous Transformations In tha last 5 quarters of human endeavor, may we commend projects emerging from 6 summits linkedin by Taiwanese-Americans gravitated by Jensen Huang (Nvidia) and 4 summits living up to King Charles wishes for humanity : Nov 2023 London Turing latest Deep Minds,, May 2024 Korea, Summer 2024 semi-private Japan State Visit to London (Charles 60th Anglo-Japan reunion as 1964 delegate to Tokyo Olympics), December 2024 India's Wadwani AI in DC (with next round of King Charles Series - Macron Paris Feb 2025).. Jensen's health AI meta-collab: Hong Kong Digital Twin 2020s supercity health centres :Tokyo Update Maso Son & Japan Royal LLM everywhere; India's sata socereignty od world largest population with Ambani & Modi; NVidia in DC with eg LOgkhttf Martin ; Taiwan RWins galore eg Fioxconnn extension to foundry for autonomous as well as mobile world; San Jose March 2-24 tenth annual upfate of most joyful parternship tech world has ever generated Over the past year, key international organizations, like the G7, OECD, and Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI), have shaped the global AI governance conversation and focused on foundational principles, critical risks, and responsible AI development. Looking ahead to 2025, how are G7 countries and corporations planning to implement AI governance frameworks and address challenges, such as the growing energy demand for AI technologies? Join the Wadhwani AI Center for the International AI Policy: Outlook for 2025 conference. This full-day event will be held at CSIS headquarters on December 9, 2024, from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM ET and will convene leading policymakers, industry experts, and thought leaders to explore the latest international efforts in AI governance. Featuring keynote speeches from distinguished figures, including Ambassador Shigeo Yamada of Japan to the United States, Ambassador Laurent Bili of France to the United States, and Sara Cohen, Deputy Head of Mission at the Embassy of Canada, this conference will highlight key international perspectives in AI governance.

Sunday, September 1, 2024

lot of architectural choice that ges into real world ai platform- on reason why nvidia leads accelerated computing but has genuine value rivals by case

Nvuidia, And. ARM ... (as well as histiry of supercomputer designers)

 I am no expert in what components make overall AI digital architectire but can imagine the number of machiens inputting and expecting output data inn ongoing situations get bigger every day - here is a probably elementary discussion with gemini on this 

QWhat ultimately makes the difference whenn 2 chip designs sould simil;ar - is it better sub-algorithms ?Gemini: When two chip designs appear similar, several factors can differentiate their performance and efficiency:

1. Architectural Innovations:

  • Microarchitecture: Subtle differences in the internal organization of the chip, such as the number and arrangement of processing cores, cache levels, and memory interfaces.
  • Instruction Set Architecture (ISA): The set of instructions the chip can understand and execute. Even small variations can impact performance.  
  • Pipeline Design: The way instructions are processed in stages can significantly affect throughput.

2. Transistor-Level Optimization:

  • Transistor Design: The specific design of transistors, including their size, shape, and material, can impact performance and power efficiency.  
  • Circuit Design: The way transistors are connected to form logic gates and other circuits can affect speed and power consumption.
  • Layout Design: The physical layout of the chip, including the placement and routing of wires, can impact performance and signal integrity.  

3. Manufacturing Process:

  • Process Node: The smaller the process node, the more transistors can be packed onto a chip, leading to higher performance and lower power consumption.
  • Manufacturing Yield: A higher yield means fewer defective chips, reducing costs and improving availability.  

4. Software and Firmware:

  • Compiler Optimization: The compiler's ability to optimize code for the specific chip architecture can significantly impact performance.
  • Driver Optimization: Efficient drivers can maximize the chip's capabilities.
  • Firmware: The firmware that controls the chip's operation can fine-tune performance and power consumption.  

5. Sub-algorithms and Algorithms:

  • Algorithm Selection: Choosing the right algorithms for specific tasks can significantly impact performance and efficiency.
  • Algorithm Implementation: The way algorithms are implemented in hardware and software can affect performance.
  • Sub-algorithms: Optimized sub-algorithms can improve the overall performance of a chip.

Ultimately, the combination of these factors determines the overall performance and efficiency of a chip. Even seemingly minor differences can have a significant impact, especially as chip designs become increasingly complex.

I think within its own chip range blackwell when up from grace hopers 80 billion to as much as 200 billion but how does one know if the architecture and other cpom,ponents you have listed have also gone up as much?

You're absolutely right to question whether the increase in transistor count in the Blackwell architecture necessarily translates to a proportional increase in performance and efficiency across all aspects of the chip. While more transistors can potentially enable more complex features and higher performance, it's essential to consider other factors that contribute to overall performance.

Here's how we can assess the improvements in Blackwell compared to Grace Hopper:

  1. Official Specifications and Benchmarks:

    • NVIDIA's Official Documentation: NVIDIA typically releases detailed technical specifications and benchmarks for its new products, highlighting the improvements in performance, power efficiency, and specific features.
    • Independent Reviews and Benchmarks: Technology reviewers and publications conduct in-depth analyses and benchmarks of new hardware, providing insights into real-world performance.
  2. Architectural Innovations:

    • New Features and Enhancements: NVIDIA often introduces new architectural features and optimizations in each generation of GPUs. These can include improvements to memory subsystems, cache hierarchies, and execution pipelines.  
    • Second-Generation Transformer Engine: Blackwell's second-generation Transformer Engine, with its support for FP4 and FP6 data types, is a significant improvement over Hopper's first-generation engine. This can lead to significant performance gains in AI workloads.  
  3. Manufacturing Process:

    • TSMC 4NP Process: Blackwell's use of TSMC's 4nm process node allows for smaller transistors and higher transistor density, which can contribute to improved performance and power efficiency.  
  4. Software and Firmware Optimization:

    • CUDA Toolkit and Driver Updates: NVIDIA's CUDA toolkit and driver updates often include optimizations for new hardware, maximizing performance and efficiency.

While a higher transistor count is a good indicator of potential performance improvements, it's crucial to consider the overall design and optimization of the chip. By analyzing the specific architectural innovations, manufacturing process, and software optimizations, we can better understand the true performance gains of the Blackwell architecture compared to its predecessors.

is there an independent ratings authority eg IEEE?

While there isn't a specific independent ratings authority like the IEEE that focuses solely on GPU benchmarks, there are several organizations and publications that conduct independent evaluations and benchmarks of GPUs:

  • TOP500: This organization ranks the world's most powerful supercomputers, including those powered by GPUs. While it doesn't provide detailed GPU-specific benchmarks, it gives a broader picture of performance in high-performance computing systems.  
  • TechRadar, Tom's Hardware, AnandTech: These tech publications conduct independent reviews and benchmarks of GPUs, comparing performance, power consumption, and features.  
  • University Research Labs: Many universities and research institutions conduct their own benchmarks and evaluations of GPUs, often focusing on specific workloads and applications.

It's important to note that while these sources provide valuable information, they may have different testing methodologies and priorities. Therefore, it's recommended to consider multiple sources and benchmarks to get a comprehensive understanding of a GPU's performance.

Additionally, keep in mind that GPU performance can vary significantly depending on the specific workload and software optimizations. It's essential to consider the specific use case and benchmark results that are relevant to your needs.  

I imagine that in live data inputs in real world come from diferent IUOTs etc; do therese help to explain choices between different AI architecture suppliers

How IoT Data Influences AI Architecture Supplier Choices

Absolutely, the nature and volume of IoT data significantly impact the choice of AI architecture suppliers.

When dealing with real-time, diverse data streams from IoT devices, several factors become crucial in selecting the right AI architecture:

1. Scalability and Real-Time Processing:

  • Cloud-Native Platforms: Cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP offer scalable infrastructure to handle large volumes of data and real-time processing.  
  • Edge Computing: For latency-sensitive applications, edge computing solutions can process data locally, reducing network latency and improving response times.  

2. Data Ingestion and Processing:

  • Data Pipelines: Efficient data pipelines are essential to ingest, clean, and transform data from various IoT sources.  
  • Stream Processing: Technologies like Apache Kafka and Apache Flink can handle high-velocity data streams in real-time.  
  • Batch Processing: For historical data analysis and offline machine learning, tools like Apache Spark can be used.  

3. Machine Learning and AI Frameworks:

  • TensorFlow and PyTorch: These popular frameworks provide the tools to build and train complex AI models.  
  • Specialized AI Hardware: Hardware accelerators like GPUs and TPUs can significantly speed up AI computations.  
  • Model Deployment: Tools like TensorFlow Serving and MLflow can deploy and manage AI models in production environments.  

4. Data Security and Privacy:

  • Data Encryption: Protecting sensitive data is crucial, especially when dealing with personal or proprietary information.  
  • Access Controls: Implementing robust access controls to limit unauthorized access to data.
  • Compliance: Adhering to data privacy regulations like GDPR and CCPA.  

5. Integration and Interoperability:

  • API Integration: Seamless integration with various IoT devices and systems.  
  • Data Standards: Adherence to industry standards like MQTT and CoAP.
  • Interoperability: Ensuring compatibility with different hardware and software components.

Key Considerations When Choosing AI Architecture Suppliers:

  • Scalability: Can the solution handle increasing data volumes and complexity?
  • Real-Time Processing: Does the solution support low-latency processing?
  • Flexibility: Can the solution adapt to evolving data sources and requirements?
  • Security and Privacy: Does the solution have robust security measures?
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Is the solution cost-effective, considering both initial investment and ongoing operational costs?
  • Vendor Support: Does the vendor provide adequate support and maintenance?

By carefully considering these factors and evaluating the capabilities of different AI architecture suppliers, organizations can select the best solution to leverage the power of IoT data and drive innovation.

can you give me some examples of latency sensistive cases?

Here are some examples of latency-sensitive applications:

Real-time Systems:

  • Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving cars rely on real-time sensor data to make split-second decisions. High latency can lead to accidents.  
  • Industrial Automation: Robotic arms and other automated machinery need to react quickly to sensor inputs to perform precise tasks.  
  • Financial Trading: High-frequency trading systems execute trades based on real-time market data. Latency can mean the difference between profit and loss.  

Network-Based Applications:

  • Video Conferencing: Video calls require low latency to ensure smooth communication and avoid echo or stuttering.  
  • Online Gaming: Online games demand low latency to prevent lag and ensure a seamless gaming experience.  
  • Remote Surgery: Surgeons performing remote operations need real-time video and haptic feedback.  

Other Applications:

  • Air Traffic Control: Air traffic controllers need to monitor and control aircraft in real time.
  • Remote Monitoring: Monitoring critical infrastructure, such as power plants or oil refineries, requires real-time data and alerts.  
  • Virtual Reality: VR experiences rely on low latency to provide immersive and realistic experiences.  

In all these cases, high latency can lead to degraded performance, errors, or even safety risks. Therefore, minimizing latency is crucial for these applications.  

How is latency defined?

Latency refers to the delay between a stimulus and a response. In the context of technology, it's the time it takes for a system to respond to a request.  

Here are some common types of latency:

  • Network Latency: The time it takes for data to travel between two points on a network.  
  • Processing Latency: The time it takes for a computer or processor to execute a task.
  • Storage Latency: The time it takes to access data from a storage device.  
  • Human-Computer Interaction Latency: The delay between a user's action and the system's response.  

In general, lower latency is better, as it leads to faster and more responsive systems.  

in edge computing cases can you give me some examples of how latyemncy intervals may vary?

Latency Intervals in Edge Computing

Latency intervals in edge computing can vary significantly depending on several factors, including:

  1. Network Distance:

    • Local Edge: If the data processing occurs on-device or at a nearby edge server, latency can be as low as a few milliseconds.
    • Regional Edge: Processing data at a regional edge data center can increase latency to tens of milliseconds.
    • Centralized Cloud: Sending data to a centralized cloud data center can result in hundreds of milliseconds of latency.
  2. Network Congestion:

    • Peak Usage Times: During peak usage periods, network congestion can increase latency.  
    • Network Quality: Network quality, including bandwidth and jitter, can impact latency.  
  3. Data Processing Complexity:

    • Simple Tasks: Simple tasks like filtering and aggregation can be processed quickly with low latency.
    • Complex Tasks: Complex tasks like machine learning inference can require more processing time, increasing latency.  
  4. Hardware and Software Optimization:

    • Efficient Hardware: High-performance hardware can reduce processing time and latency.  
    • Optimized Software: Well-optimized software can minimize overhead and improve performance.

Examples of Latency Intervals in Edge Computing

Scenario 1: Autonomous Vehicle

  • On-device processing: Milliseconds (for simple tasks like obstacle detection)
  • Edge server processing: Tens of milliseconds (for complex tasks like path planning)
  • Cloud-based processing: Hundreds of milliseconds (for high-level decision-making)

Scenario 2: Industrial IoT

  • Edge gateway processing: Milliseconds (for basic data filtering and aggregation)
  • Cloud-based analytics: Seconds or minutes (for advanced analytics and machine learning)

Scenario 3: Smart City

  • Edge device processing: Milliseconds (for real-time traffic signal control)
  • Edge server processing: Tens of milliseconds (for video analytics and anomaly detection)
  • Cloud-based data storage and analysis: Seconds or minutes (for long-term data storage and trend analysis)

By understanding these factors and carefully designing edge computing architectures, it's possible to minimize latency and maximize the benefits of edge computing.

Is it true to say that currently thgere is still quitre a lot of human skill invoilved in the architectire of a client's specific digitalm platform or are there ways in which ai digital twins etc reharse configurations makinng this ultimately less a human skil thing and more an ai thing?

No comments:

Post a Comment